Friday, November 21, 2014

Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare

Michael Hoffman analyses both how shadow governments use psychological warfare and why it works on late American man. Along the way we get a brilliant analysis of occult symbolism. Hoffman suggests that moden American man suffers from three things: amnesia, abulia, and apathy (Hoffman 9). This is important for his next thesis: the shadow government (or Cryptocracy or Regime or New World Order, call it what you will) can “pull these stunts” largely because a) the people are apathetic and so b) won’t resist.

Hermeticism and Alchemy

Alchemy is not simply transmuting lead into gold. It is transmuting society as well. It is turn to lead (traditional Christian man) into gold (Enlightenment project). Fabled alchemy had at least three goals to accomplish before the total decay of matter, the total breakdown we are witnessing all around us today, was fulfilled--at least for American culture-- and these are:

1.The Creation and Destruction of Primordial Matter (the atom was split at Trinity Site, NM, which runs along the 33rd degree north latitude)

2. The Killing of the Divine King. (JFK was killed at the 33rd degree of north parallel latitude between the Trinity River and the Triple Underpass at Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas. Dealey Plaza was the site of the first masonic temple in Dallas. This was also a televised slaughter in a sense). And for the record, the above analysis stands no matter one’s views on the Official Government Story of Spanky the Magic Bullet. For the record, I believe in the Magic Bullet. The above argument hinges on topography and synchronicity, not on who the shooter was.

3.The Bringing of Prima Materia to Prima Terra (91).

a.The "Phoenix" lunar landing module, after its return to the orbiting mother ship piloted by Michael Collins, was jettisoned directly into the sun in fulfillment of one of the most persistent themes of alchemical lore and Rosicrucian poetry: the "sexual marriage" of the sun and the moon (98).

These alchemical goals have been accomplished. The question remains: what is the affect/effect upon modern society? Hoffman notes,

“We are mocked, disoriented and demoralized. Occult prestige and potency is heightened. This is what simplistic researchers miss: the function of macabre arrogance thumbing its nose at us while we do nothing except spread the tale of their immunity and invincibility further. That is the game plan operant here” (89).


The message is subtler than that. By common law and moral law those who are aware of crimes are also guilty. The Regime’s after-the-fact revelations is designed to further our guilt, knowing we won’t do anything about it. It is social engineering at its finest. Hoffman continues,

“As I've pointed out, secrets like this were rarely revealed in the past because traditional people had not yet completed the alchemical processing. To make such perverse, modern revelations to an unprocessed, healthy and vigorous population possessed of will, memory, adherence to their deepest inner intuition and intense interest in their own salvation, would not have been a good thing for the cryptocracy. It would have proved fatal to them.

But to reveal these after-the-act secrets in our modern time, to a people who have no memory, no will-power and no interest in their own fate except in so far as it may serve as momentary
titillation and entertainment actually strengthens the enslavement of such a people (89)”.


Analysis

The book’s weakness is its brevity. Too many explosive issues were only barely touched upon. One wishes that he would have better documented some Freemasonic references. I understand his interest in the Son of Sam murders, but it appears he overdeveloped that point. Aside from these criticisms, the book is pure gold.

10 comments:

  1. Sorry I didn't see your comment earlier. Yeah, the lack of footnotes is a problem. He documents a few masonic references, but even then he doesn't develop the thought (the section on Killing of the King should have been about 5 pages, instead of two paragraphs).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I suspect in the end this work will be found to have about as much truth and substance as Dan Brown's fiction, The DaVinci Code. Engaging this kind of occult assertion/speculation strikes me as little more than a colossal distraction from the "one thing needful" to which all Christians are called (Luke 10:42). I can tell you from my own experience that imbibing enough of this stuff will make you feel like you have inside knowledge and like you are on the brink of discovering the final answer to all questions about what's "really going on" in the world, but in reality it will be blinding you to the only things really worth knowing and taking you down a rabbit hole to insanity instead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes and no. I've seen people go down dangerous paths on this, yet Paul did mention exposing the works of darkness.

      The difference between this and the Da Vinci code is that this author's documentations are in fact accurate. The problem is that there are two few.

      Delete
  3. ***Paul also teaches in that same passage about spiritual warfare that the weapons of the Apostles' warfare are "not carnal, but mighty in God" with the purpose of "bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ." How does modern speculation or research about human occultists' (real or imagined) conspiratorial political activity throughout the ages accomplish this? Can you give some concrete examples of how this has furthered the work of Christ in your life or someone else's?***

    For one, I don't see myself as speculating, since most everything I am saying can be documented. For two, Paul is saying carnal weapons are probably swords, not arguments.

    For the rest of your comment, I think we are talking past each other. I am not saying we should do x, y, and z (don't remember saying we should do anything). And I know we can't "do" much to change it. That's one of the reasons I am a monarchist, and not a Republo-Democrat.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You are probably right we are talking past each other.

    Are you familiar with Hislop's The Two Babylons? If so, what is your opinion of that work? It's an extremely copiously footnoted work--some might say well-documented--but that doesn't mean that the reasoning connecting that documentation is sound, and more learned folks than me have, upon deeper examination, discovered that even some of what is "documented" was actually fabricated by its author (not quite as extreme as Zeitgeist, but equally misleading).

    To be frank, had I looked into the credentials and bio. of the author whose work you cite here before I engaged you in comments, I would not have bothered discussing anything with you. My bad. I won't be repeating that mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have heard of Hislop's work but I haven't read it. It's hard to get excited about reading e-books and pdf files.

    Here is an example of what I am talking about. A lot of Eastern Orthodox are getting excited about Aleksandr Dugin's Eurasianism. I, too, thought it was interesting, but I also noticed that the symbol of his movement is the exact symbol of ancient Chaos Magik. Even more interesting, Dugin propounds the very theses (under Orthodox garb) of Chaos Magik. Therefore, I avoided Dugin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never heard of Dugin and I don't know any Orthodox who would find what you describe here remotely interesting. Care to link to an "excited" Orthodox review of Dugin? I'm opposed to connecting symbols (used in different contexts) in their meaning just because they are the same or similar. Language and other humanly-created symbolisms simply do not work that way. Even symbols with common meanings connected to universal experience within the created world can mean very different things depending on the situation or context. Consider that even in biblical terms water symbolizes simultaneously both life (because it sustains us) and death (because we can drown in it). What it means in any given context is determined by that context. Just about any other symbol related to the creation can function in similar ways. It's Hislop's failure to recognize this which is the biggest failure of his thesis. Connecting things just because there is a superficial resemblance or identity (without recognizing the new context in which they actually come to mean quite different things) is a classic description of "magical" thinking or superstition. I don't buy into that. Apparently, you do, but the truth is both words (which are also symbols) and pictorial symbols or images may change in their meaning with changing contexts over time. If we fail to recognize the real nature of the context in which a word or symbol is being used, we will err in our interpretation (by anachronistically superimposing an earlier or later meaning upon all uses of the term or symbol).

      Delete
  6. Having now looked at Dugin's bio, I read nothing "Orthodox" about him. He's a fascist, so, by definition, is not Orthodox. Fascists (quite understandably) are a "marginalized minority" in Russia (according to that bio.). Orthodox (in faith, not just in cultural heritage) are apostolic biblical Christians.

    Jacob, I cannot read you as anything but one very confused young man. Forgive me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry that's how you read me. I really don't know how I was "confusing," but so be it.

      ***Connecting things just because there is a superficial resemblance or identity (without recognizing the new context in which they actually come to mean quite different things) is a classic description of "magical" thinking or superstition. I don't buy into that. Apparently, you do***

      That's news to me

      Delete
  7. As to Dugin, he has advised Putin on a number of issues (though Putin has distanced himself somewhat lately).

    ReplyDelete